Why is 'studies show' considered an AI writing tell?

AI often uses 'studies show' without naming the actual study, year, or source. This vague citation is a red flag because real research has specific details. When no source follows, readers can't verify the claim, which is how AI-generated content spreads unsupported facts.

When is it okay to use 'studies show'?

Only when you immediately name the study, year, and institution. For example, 'A 2021 study in Psychological Science found...' is legitimate. 'Studies show' alone, with no follow-up details, signals lazy or fabricated writing.

What should I write instead of 'studies show'?

Be specific. Write 'A 2023 Stanford study found...' or 'Research by [author] at [institution] showed...' If you can't name the source, cut the claim entirely. Specificity builds trust and proves you've actually read the research.

What are synonyms for 'studies show' in academic writing?

Instead of vague alternatives, use precise citations like 'A 2023 Stanford study found' or 'cite the specific source or cut the claim.' Avoid other hedging phrases like 'research indicates' or 'evidence suggests' without details. Named sources are always stronger than generic hedges.

How can I check if 'studies show' is being used correctly?

Look for the next sentence or clause. Does it name a year, author, institution, or publication? If not, the phrase is likely a placeholder for missing research. Good writing backs up 'studies show' with concrete details you can actually look up.

Moderate AI signalHedges & fillers

Is “studies show” an AI phrase?

Everything about “studies show” as an AI writing signal, how strongly it's associated with generated text, why it reads as artificial, and what to write instead.

Quick answer

Partly, "studies show" is common in AI writing, but humans use it too. Density is what matters. AI cites “studies” it cannot name.

Is “studies show” associated with AI writing?

Moderately associated, legitimate when a citation follows, an AI tell when it never does.

Why it sounds artificial

AI cites “studies” it cannot name. The phrase without a named source, year, or number is a credibility hole, and increasingly a fabrication risk.

What to say instead of “studies show”

A 2023 Stanford study found…cite the specific source or cut the claim

Example rewrite

AI-flavored

Studies show that handwriting improves memory.

Human

A 2021 study in Psychological Science found students who took notes by hand recalled concepts better a week later than laptop note-takers.

Check your own text for “studies show”

Runs in your browser, nothing is uploaded. For all 221 AI phrases at once, use the full AI Phrase Checker.

Don't rewrite it by hand

Paste your draft and get natural, human-sounding writing in seconds. “studies show” and 220 other AI tells handled automatically.

Try the Humanizer Open the Phrase Checker

Using “studies show” doesn't mean your text was written by AI, humans coined it. It means the phrase is statistically over-represented in AI output, so heavy use can make writing read as generated. Treat this page as editing guidance, not a verdict.

EssayToneBuilt by ex-Stanford researchers, EssayTone uses advanced humanization technology to help students write naturally and confidently.

Company

Tools

AI Phrase Checker

Made with ❤️ in San Francisco